ArticleScientific reports2025
An improved greedy equivalent search method based on relative entropy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As a well-known Bayesian network structure learning algorithm in equivalence class space (E-space), Greedy equivalence search (GES) is used in many fields. However, it encounters high complexity when searching for information from an empty graph. If the initial graph of GES is an equivalence class containing the strongest dependencies instead of an empty graph, its performance will be significantly improved. In this study, we propose a three-phase algorithm to establish the initial graph. First, we design a measure based on relative entropy to evaluate the relation between variables. Then, the variables are connected based on the previously designed metrics and the resulting graph is transformed into E-space. Finally, the resulting graph is used as the initial graph of GES for E-space optimization. We compare the proposed algorithm with GES in efficiency and accuracy, and the results show that our algorithm improves the efficiency and accuracy of GES. Furthermore, extensive comparisons are designed to compare our method with other state-of-the-art methods on benchmarks and real data about COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.