Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41136458›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Phase-probability shaping for speckle-free holographic lithography.

Dong Zhao, Weiwei Fu, Jun He, Ziqin Li, Fang-Wen Sun, Kun Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dong Zhao *Department of Optics and Optical Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7173-0500
Weiwei Fu *Department of Optics and Optical Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4972-9495
Jun He *Department of Optics and Optical Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7384-3418
Ziqin LiDepartment of Optics and Optical Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Fang-Wen SunDepartment of Optics and Optical Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9625-7390
Kun HuangDepartment of Optics and Optical Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China. huangk17@ustc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9391-149X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical holography has undergone rapid development since its invention in 1948, but the accompanying speckles with alternating dark and bright spots of randomly varying shapes are still untamed now due to the intrinsic fluctuations from irregular complex-field superposition. Despite spatial, temporal and spectral averages for speckle reduction, holographic images cannot yet meet the requirement for high-homogeneity, edge-sharp and shape-unlimited features in optical display and lithography. Here we report that holographic speckles can be removed by narrowing the probability density distribution of encoded phase to homogenize optical superposition. Guided by this physical insight, an Adam-gradient-descent probability-shaping (APS) method is developed to prohibit the fluctuations of intensity in a computer-generated hologram (CGH), which empowers the experimental reconstruction of irregular images with ultralow speckle contrast (C = 0.08) and record-high edge sharpness (~1000 mm

Identifiers

PMID41136458
PMCPMC12552575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.