ArticleNature communications2025
Modeling macroscopic brain dynamics with brain-inspired computing architecture.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Algorithm-hardware co-design of neuromorphic networks with dual memory pathways.Nature machine intelligence · 2026Article
- Modeling macroscopic brain dynamics with brain-inspired computing architecture.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the brain requires modeling large-scale neural dynamics, where coarse-grained modeling of macroscopic brain behaviors is a powerful paradigm for linking brain structure to function with empirical data. However, the model inversion process remains computationally intensive and time-consuming, limiting research efficiency and medical deployment. In this work, we present a pipeline bridging coarse-grained brain modeling and advanced computing architectures. We introduce a dynamics-aware quantization framework that enables accurate low-precision simulation with maintained dynamical characteristics, thereby addressing the precision challenges inherent in the brain-inspired computing architecture. Furthermore, to exploit hardware capabilities, we develop hierarchical parallelism mapping strategies tailored for brain-inspired computing chips and GPUs. Experimental results demonstrate that the deployed low-precision models maintain high functional fidelity while achieving tens to hundreds-fold acceleration over commonly used CPUs. This work provides essential computational infrastructures for modeling macroscopic brain dynamics and extends the application of brain-inspired computing to scientific computing in neuroscience and medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.