ArticleScientific reports2025
A deep learning runoff prediction model based on wavelet decomposition and dynamic feature fusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Monitoring and Early Warning of the Cage-Rearing Broiler Farming Environment Based on an Inspection Robot.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the stochasticity, time-varying characteristics, and nonlinear dynamics of runoff series, this research proposes a novel deep learning architecture, BWDformer, based on wavelet decomposition and dynamic feature fusion, to enhance the precision of streamflow forecasting. Based on Informer, the model innovatively integrates wavelet decomposition, a dynamic feature fusion module (DFF), and Bayesian optimization to address the limitations of conventional deep learning models in multi-scale feature integration, long-term dependency capture, and dynamic feature adjustment. Specifically, wavelet decomposition is first applied to extract multi-scale features through adaptive time windows, accurately capturing short-term fluctuations, seasonal variations, and long-term trends in runoff data. Then, based on DFF, the feature weights are dynamically adjusted using the attention mechanism to optimize the feature combination, thereby enhancing the model's ability to analyze complex runoff sequences. Finally, Bayesian optimization is used to efficiently search for hyperparameters, significantly improving the model's training efficiency. To verify the model's effectiveness, this study tested it at four hydrological stations: Hongshanhe, Manwan, Baihe, and Tangnaihai. The results show that BWDformer significantly outperforms benchmark models, such as CNN, LSTM, Transformer, and Informer, in terms of MAE, RMSE, R, NSE, and KGE. For example, in Hongshanhe, the MAE is 0.1921, a decrease of 18.82% compared to CNN (0.2366), 4.65% compared to LSTM (0.2014), 15.63% compared to Transformer (0.2277), and 7.87% compared to Informer (0.2086). RMSE decreased by 25.46% compared to CNN, KGE was 0.9651, increased by 18.51% compared to Transformer (0.8143), and increased by 13.43% compared to Informer (0.8506). In Baihe, the MAE is 228.6971 m ³/s, a decrease of about 2.35% compared to CNN (243.0662), and the R value reaches 0.9998, an increase of 4.26% compared to CNN (0.9591). NSE is 0.9972, an increase of 18.73% compared to Transformer (0.8398), KGE is 0.9934, an increase of 9.79% compared to Informer (0.9048). These results verify the excellent performance of BWDformer in improving prediction accuracy, robustness, and practicality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.