Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41136444›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A deep learning runoff prediction model based on wavelet decomposition and dynamic feature fusion.

Dong-Mei Xu, Qi-Qi Zeng, Wen-Chuan Wang, Xu-Tong Zhang, Yi-Yang Wang, Hong-Fei Zang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dong-Mei XuCollege of Water Resources, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.
Qi-Qi ZengCollege of Water Resources, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.
Wen-Chuan WangCollege of Water Resources, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, 450046, China. wangwen1621@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1367-5886
Xu-Tong ZhangCollege of Water Resources, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.
Yi-Yang WangCollege of Water Resources, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.
Hong-Fei ZangCollege of Water Resources, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.

Funding

Henan Province Centrally Guided Local Science and Technology Development Fund Projects for 2024 Z20241471017Key Special Projects of National Key Research and Development Program on "Major Natural Disasters and Public Safety" 2024YFC3012300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the stochasticity, time-varying characteristics, and nonlinear dynamics of runoff series, this research proposes a novel deep learning architecture, BWDformer, based on wavelet decomposition and dynamic feature fusion, to enhance the precision of streamflow forecasting. Based on Informer, the model innovatively integrates wavelet decomposition, a dynamic feature fusion module (DFF), and Bayesian optimization to address the limitations of conventional deep learning models in multi-scale feature integration, long-term dependency capture, and dynamic feature adjustment. Specifically, wavelet decomposition is first applied to extract multi-scale features through adaptive time windows, accurately capturing short-term fluctuations, seasonal variations, and long-term trends in runoff data. Then, based on DFF, the feature weights are dynamically adjusted using the attention mechanism to optimize the feature combination, thereby enhancing the model's ability to analyze complex runoff sequences. Finally, Bayesian optimization is used to efficiently search for hyperparameters, significantly improving the model's training efficiency. To verify the model's effectiveness, this study tested it at four hydrological stations: Hongshanhe, Manwan, Baihe, and Tangnaihai. The results show that BWDformer significantly outperforms benchmark models, such as CNN, LSTM, Transformer, and Informer, in terms of MAE, RMSE, R, NSE, and KGE. For example, in Hongshanhe, the MAE is 0.1921, a decrease of 18.82% compared to CNN (0.2366), 4.65% compared to LSTM (0.2014), 15.63% compared to Transformer (0.2277), and 7.87% compared to Informer (0.2086). RMSE decreased by 25.46% compared to CNN, KGE was 0.9651, increased by 18.51% compared to Transformer (0.8143), and increased by 13.43% compared to Informer (0.8506). In Baihe, the MAE is 228.6971 m ³/s, a decrease of about 2.35% compared to CNN (243.0662), and the R value reaches 0.9998, an increase of 4.26% compared to CNN (0.9591). NSE is 0.9972, an increase of 18.73% compared to Transformer (0.8398), KGE is 0.9934, an increase of 9.79% compared to Informer (0.9048). These results verify the excellent performance of BWDformer in improving prediction accuracy, robustness, and practicality.

Indexed as

Bayesian optimizationDynamic feature fusionMulti-scale featuresRunoff predictionWavelet decomposition

Identifiers

PMID41136444
PMCPMC12552506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.