Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41136435›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Beliefs about god buffer against the health risks of loneliness and social isolation in five major religions and 22 countries.

Alexandra S Wormley, Carley Vornlocher, Chayce R Baldwin, Micaela Rodriguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexandra S WormleyDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. awormley@umich.edu.
Carley VornlocherDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
Chayce R BaldwinDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Micaela RodriguezDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Funding

The plasticity of well-being: A research network to define, measure and promote human flourishingU24AT011289 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DAVIDSON, RICHARD J · 2021 to 2024
$2.4M
NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT011289NIH HHS U24AT011289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Religious individuals consistently report lower levels of loneliness and social isolation, as well as better health, than the nonreligious. Although supportive religious communities are well-known contributors to these outcomes, the nature of one's relationship with the divine may also play a key role. For the over 5 billion religious people in the world, belief in a higher power may offer protection against loneliness even when individuals are physically alone. Further, a relationship with an omnipresent, loving higher power may serve as a powerful source of social support that not only alleviates loneliness but also buffers its negative effects on health. Using Global Flourishing Study data from over 180,000 individuals across five major world religions in 22 countries, we find that: (1) individuals across religious affiliations are less lonely and less socially isolated than the nonreligious, and (2) believing in and feeling loved by a higher power attenuate the extent to which social isolation and loneliness predict worse physical and mental health. Together, these findings deepen our understanding of the role of religious beliefs in shaping both the experience and health risks of loneliness and social isolation and identify new globally applicable intervention targets to address these pressing public health problems.

Indexed as

LonelinessReligionSocial IsolationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedSocial SupportBeliefsCultureHealthIsolationLonelinessReligionSocial supportWell-being

Identifiers

PMID41136435
PMCPMC12552422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.