Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41136434›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

MOTT modular optical tool tracking framework enabling efficient benchmarking.

Federico Salerno, Alessandro Contenti, Luca Ulrich, Giorgia Marullo, Sandro Moos, Enrico Vezzetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Federico SalernoDepartment of Production and Management Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, 10129, Turin, Italy. federico.salerno@polito.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5282-9513
Alessandro ContentiDepartment of Production and Management Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, 10129, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3436-0829
Luca UlrichDepartment of Production and Management Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, 10129, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8407-0660
Giorgia MarulloDepartment of Production and Management Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, 10129, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2359-4409
Sandro MoosDepartment of Production and Management Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, 10129, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5097-7344
Enrico VezzettiDepartment of Production and Management Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, 10129, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8910-7020

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical tool tracking is the process of determining the 6DoF pose of an object in real time using visual sensor streams and image processing algorithms. It enables spatial localization in applications such as robotics, medical imaging, augmented reality, and precision manufacturing. However, existing solutions often involve tight coupling between hardware and software, complicating the management and benchmarking of different tracking systems. This paper presents the Modular Optical Tool Tracking (MOTT) framework, a unified platform for implementing, integrating, and benchmarking optical tracking solutions. A requirement-based design approach was adopted, using Quality Function Deployment (QFD) to systematically derive technical features and identify design drivers that guided the architecture of the framework. The resulting software framework standardizes the concept of an optical tracking method, featuring a flexible and extensible architecture based on object-oriented principles. Two marker-based tracking methods using an RGB camera as video source were evaluated through the developed framework. The presented case studies showcased the use of the framework for method implementation and comparison within a unified pipeline, reporting computational metrics such as frame rate, CPU and memory usage, and providing pose visualizations. The proposed framework enables standardized evaluation and benchmarking of optical tracking systems, and provides a foundation for future extensions involving non-optical tracking modalities and large-scale comparative studies. The implementation is openly available at https://github.com/tooltip-optical-tracking/mott-framework .

Indexed as

BenchmarkingModular frameworkOptical trackingPose estimationQFDTool tracking

Identifiers

PMID41136434
PMCPMC12552474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.