ArticleScientific reports2025
MOTT modular optical tool tracking framework enabling efficient benchmarking.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MOTT modular optical tool tracking framework enabling efficient benchmarking.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optical tool tracking is the process of determining the 6DoF pose of an object in real time using visual sensor streams and image processing algorithms. It enables spatial localization in applications such as robotics, medical imaging, augmented reality, and precision manufacturing. However, existing solutions often involve tight coupling between hardware and software, complicating the management and benchmarking of different tracking systems. This paper presents the Modular Optical Tool Tracking (MOTT) framework, a unified platform for implementing, integrating, and benchmarking optical tracking solutions. A requirement-based design approach was adopted, using Quality Function Deployment (QFD) to systematically derive technical features and identify design drivers that guided the architecture of the framework. The resulting software framework standardizes the concept of an optical tracking method, featuring a flexible and extensible architecture based on object-oriented principles. Two marker-based tracking methods using an RGB camera as video source were evaluated through the developed framework. The presented case studies showcased the use of the framework for method implementation and comparison within a unified pipeline, reporting computational metrics such as frame rate, CPU and memory usage, and providing pose visualizations. The proposed framework enables standardized evaluation and benchmarking of optical tracking systems, and provides a foundation for future extensions involving non-optical tracking modalities and large-scale comparative studies. The implementation is openly available at https://github.com/tooltip-optical-tracking/mott-framework .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.