ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimized NaOH and KOH treatments for interfacial and mechanical enhancement of agro-marine ash reinforced aluminum composites.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A systematic comparative study evaluated NaOH and KOH alkali activation of three agro-marine ashes (periwinkle shell powder, plantain stem ash, eucalyptus wood ash) as reinforcements for AA6061 aluminium matrix composites. Treatments were performed at 4 M and 30-120 min and characterized by SEM, EDS, BET, XRD, FTIR, cyclic voltammetry, and statistical modelling (regression, ANOVA). NaOH produced uniform surface etching, a 32.5% reduction in mean particle size (125.3 → 84.6 μm, p < 0.05, mean ± SD, n = 3) and a more homogeneous hydroxylation ( ≈ + 26% FTIR O-H; surface O 8.1 ± 0.4 wt%). KOH generated a markedly higher specific surface area (1850 ± 92.5 m² g⁻¹ vs. 572.3 ± 29.7 for NaOH), greater microporosity (82% vs. 71%), and higher electrochemical capacitance (Na₂SO₄: 185.0 ± 7.2 F g⁻¹ vs. 61.27 ± 3.5 F g⁻¹). Regression models show excellent predictive accuracy (NaOH: R² = 0.9842, RMSE = 1.7 μm; KOH: R² = 0.9883, RMSE = 1.9 μm) and ANOVA indicates treatment chemistry explains 71% of variance (η² = 0.71, p = 5.79 × 10⁻⁴). Void content rose from 3.24% (untreated) to 3.85% (NaOH, 60 min) and 6.12% (KOH, 90 min); applying established porosity-strength correlations implies an estimated tensile-strength penalty of ≈ 15-20% for the highest-porosity KOH route. NaOH, therefore, yields dense, chemically uniform particles that favour interfacial bonding and predictable load transfer; KOH yields high-surface-area, porous particulates advantageous for adsorption/energy applications and mechanical interlocking at the expense of fatigue and tensile reliability. The study defines process windows and energy metrics (NaOH ≈ 2.4 kWh·kg⁻¹; KOH ≈ 4.0 kWh·kg⁻¹) and provides a mechanistic framework for selecting alkali routes according to target composite function. Figure 1 shows key findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.