ArticleScientific data2025
SIGNAL: Dataset for Semantic and Inferred Grammar Neurological Analysis of Language.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, the idea of brain-model alignment has been the topic of several influential works. However, most of previous studies were based on datasets collected during regular reading tasks where the subjects were not exposed to processing linguistic incongruencies, and stimuli were not controlled for key linguistic properties. Meanwhile, interpretability studies of Large Language Models pay growing attention to thoroughly designed linguistic tasks based on certain acceptability measures. We present a dataset that contains 600 sentences with a combination of congruent and grammatically or/and semantically incongruent sentences coupled with high density 64-channel EEG recordings of 21 participants. The text stimuli were assessed by native speakers and later used in EEG recording and validation and LLM probing. The validation results proved suitability of the data for future research on brain-model alignment in the linguistic context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.