Observational studyScientific reports2025
Increasing the accessibility to colorectal cancer screening in the community via faecal immunochemical test kits dispensed via automated kiosk.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Data analysis of residents aged 40-59 in colorectal cancer screening in Pudong New Area, Shanghai, 2013-2023.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake was low in Singapore. An automated kiosk (KIPFIT) dispensing Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) kits was developed to facilitate CRC screening. A prospective observational study leveraged on case-encounter approach to recruit community-dwelling adults aged 50-85 years. They were guided to collect two FIT kits from the kiosk on passing by a local multi-purpose mall. The study aimed to determine their CRC screening uptake by returning minimally one completed kit within two months after its collection. Data on their demographics, awareness, and prior screening history, and kiosk usability (as measured by the System Usability Scale SUS) were analysed using bivariate tests, followed by logistic regression for CRC screening completion and linear regression for SUS scores. Among the 350 participants (mean age 66.1 years; 57.4% female; 91.4% Chinese), 68.9% completed CRC screening, which was associated with Chinese ethnicity (AOR = 3.13, 95%CI = 1.42-6.90) and awareness of screening (AOR = 2.18, 95%CI = 1.10-4.33). Benchmarked at 68, the mean SUS score was 57.7, with lower scores in older and lower-educated participants. Guided use of the KIPFIT kiosk had increased CRC screening uptake. Further research is needed to assess its utility without assistance and its effects on CRC screening in real-world setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.