ArticleNature communications2025
Unsteady flows uncover the limits of the stress-optic law.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unsteady flows uncover the limits of the stress-optic law.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Birefringence induced in complex fluid flows, containing anisotropic microstructures, exhibits vibrant patterns, captivating people perceptually. More practically, it has garnered multidisciplinary expectations on the noninvasive characterization of stress fields in flowing materials based on the stress-optic law established for solid materials, prospecting its in situ and in vitro applications. Here, we question such a paradigm by demonstrating the failure of the law in unsteady flows through laboratory experiments. The latter originates from the relaxation of the microscopic structures, characterized by the Deborah number De, which is a dimensionless number that compares the material's relaxation time and the characteristic time of the applied deformation process. Flow birefringence turns out to represent accumulated fluid deformation only when fluids behave like solids with large De, whereas the anisotropy of the microstructures relaxes for small De, diminishing birefringence. We generalize the formulation of flow birefringence evolution by explicitly decomposing the microscopic and macroscopic contributions to it, providing a unified understanding of flow birefringence based on deep physical interpretations attained through laboratory experiments. Our findings may encourage undertaking a drastic course correction in the future development of flow birefringence as a practical tool for stress quantification based on present-day knowledge, and enlighten its potential usage.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.