Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41136400›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Unsteady flows uncover the limits of the stress-optic law.

Daisuke Noto, Kohei Ohie, Yuji Tasaka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daisuke NotoDepartment of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. dnoto@sas.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3713-4777
Kohei OhieGraduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9137-044X
Yuji TasakaLaboratory for Flow Control, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan. tasaka@eng.hokudai.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8943-4803

Funding

MEXT | JST | Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology (PRESTO) JPMJPR21O6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Birefringence induced in complex fluid flows, containing anisotropic microstructures, exhibits vibrant patterns, captivating people perceptually. More practically, it has garnered multidisciplinary expectations on the noninvasive characterization of stress fields in flowing materials based on the stress-optic law established for solid materials, prospecting its in situ and in vitro applications. Here, we question such a paradigm by demonstrating the failure of the law in unsteady flows through laboratory experiments. The latter originates from the relaxation of the microscopic structures, characterized by the Deborah number De, which is a dimensionless number that compares the material's relaxation time and the characteristic time of the applied deformation process. Flow birefringence turns out to represent accumulated fluid deformation only when fluids behave like solids with large De, whereas the anisotropy of the microstructures relaxes for small De, diminishing birefringence. We generalize the formulation of flow birefringence evolution by explicitly decomposing the microscopic and macroscopic contributions to it, providing a unified understanding of flow birefringence based on deep physical interpretations attained through laboratory experiments. Our findings may encourage undertaking a drastic course correction in the future development of flow birefringence as a practical tool for stress quantification based on present-day knowledge, and enlighten its potential usage.

Identifiers

PMID41136400
PMCPMC12552630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.