The potential of TDP-43 PET ligands for a biological diagnosis of TDP-43 proteinopathies.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Outer nuclear layer thinning as an in vivo biomarker for discriminating probable FTLD-tau from probable FTLD-TDP with PET-supported subtyping.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2026
   Article
2. Molecular signatures and biomarker development for limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE).Acta neuropathologica · 2026
   Review
3. Integration over reduction: multimodal PET and fluid biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease and beyond.Current opinion in neurology · 2026
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.