SynthesisOpen heart2025
Beta blockers and hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Open heart, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- State-of-the-art review: ß-blockade in critical illness.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Imaging-Based Risk Stratification for Sudden Cardiac Death in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Current Evidence and Clinical Perspectives.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Evolving strategies in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: myosin inhibitors as monotherapy compared with beta-blockers.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSince the 1960s, beta blockers have been used to treat hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM), a genetic disorder causing abnormal heart muscle thickening. This systematic review evaluates their efficacy across clinical outcomes.
methodsRegistered on PROSPERO (CRD42022344255), searches were performed in June 2022 and updated in September 2025 across MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PubMed. Two reviewers independently screened studies. Meta-analysis was undertaken when ≥3 comparable datasets were available; otherwise, narrative synthesis was used.
results21 studies including 775 adults met inclusion criteria. Beta blockers significantly reduced left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient (Standardised mean difference (SMD) -1.57; 95% CI -2.07 to -1.07) and heart rate (SMD -1.19; 95% CI -2.24 to -0.14). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the LVOT effect, while heart rate effects remained heterogeneous. Improvements in New York Heart Association class, exercise tolerance and symptom burden were consistently reported, although data were subjective and small in scale. Mortality evidence was limited to two retrospective cohorts with divergent findings.
conclusionsBeta blockers provide consistent haemodynamic and symptomatic benefits in HOCM, but most evidence derives from small, older studies with high risk of bias and limited survival data. Contemporary, adequately powered randomised controlled trials are required to define optimal agent selection, dosing and long-term outcomes. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022344255.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.