ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Roles and responsibilities of registered nurses in the early recognition and management of sepsis in acute hospital settings: a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of an Emergency Triage Nursing Strategy on Early Recognition and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Sepsis: A Single-Center Retrospective Pre-Post Case-Note Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSepsis causes over 20% of deaths annually, with early recognition and management being key strategies to preventing patient deterioration. Despite being the largest group of hospital-based clinicians, the role of registered nurses (RNs) in sepsis remains poorly defined.
objectiveTo describe the roles and responsibilities of RNs in early recognition and management of sepsis in acute hospital settings, applying the
methodsThe review was conducted using the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. We searched Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and PubMed for studies discussing the contribution of RNs in acute hospital-based sepsis care. Data were extracted and mapped to the AACTT framework domains.
results27 (90%) of 30 included studies described RNs as the
conclusionNurses perform essential actions in early sepsis recognition and management, with several RN roles focused on sepsis care identified. A broader scope of nurse-initiated actions was identified in resource-restricted contexts to meet clinical demand. There is potential for a greater scope of nursing actions in sepsis care for the benefit of patients and health services, but to achieve this, standardised training requirements need to be developed, and scope of practice defined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.