Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41136217›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2025

Trying to create order in chaos-healthcare workers' perspective of COVID-19 intensive care (a qualitative study).

Lisbet Meurling, Cecilia Escher, Oili Dahl, Walter Osika, Mini Ruiz, Mats Ericson, Johan Creutzfeldt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lisbet MeurlingAnesthesia and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Huddinge, Sweden lisbet.meurling@ki.se.ORCID 0009-0009-1157-3780
Cecilia EscherClinical Sciences Intervention and Technology-CLINTEC, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7086-7409
Oili DahlIntensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Walter OsikaNeurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mini RuizClinical Sciences Intervention and Technology-CLINTEC, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mats EricsonRoyal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan CreutzfeldtAnesthesia and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Huddinge, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic flooded intensive care units with patients needing supportive care. In Scandinavia, the greater Stockholm area was among the most affected. This study aimed to capture healthcare workers' conditions and challenges during this prolonged crisis, including perspectives from the intensive care team.

methodsThe data consist of 22 semistructured individual interviews with regular and temporary healthcare workers involved in the intensive care of COVID-19 patients, including nurse assistants, registered nurses, critical care nurses and consultant and junior physicians. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.

resultsThe overarching theme that emerged was

conclusionOur study demonstrates challenges and identifies workarounds, support strategies and personnel learning experienced by COVID-19 intensive care teams in delivering patient care, ensuring patient safety and managing staff resilience. The findings can be used to better prepare for future crises.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCOVID-19Critical CareHealth PersonnelIntensive Care UnitsAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMalePandemicsQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2SwedenCommunicationCOVID-19Critical carePatient safetyTeamwork

Identifiers

PMID41136217
PMCPMC12557768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.