ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2025
Assessment of asthma care, self-management and healthcare services access during the Sudanese war: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAsthma poses a great burden as one of the most common long-term non-communicable diseases. The April 2023 Sudanese war has severely disrupted the healthcare system, greatly affecting asthmatic patients by limiting access to medications and diagnostic services. Therefore, this research aims to investigate asthma control, self-management and healthcare access among asthma patients in Sudan during the ongoing war.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among Sudanese patients with asthma during the ongoing war using a convenience sampling. An online questionnaire was distributed from September 2024 to June 2025. It covered sociodemographic data, the validated Asthma Control Test (ACT), self-management and healthcare access. Data were analysed using SPSS software, employing descriptive statistics, χ
resultsAmong the 229 asthmatic patients surveyed, 60.3% had poorly controlled asthma. Since the onset of the conflict, 43.2% had not attended any follow-up visits, while 48.5% required at least one emergency room visit during the war. Despite these challenges, 86.0% reported having quick access to healthcare during active attacks. However, 17.9% were unable to obtain their medications regularly, forcing many to adopt alternative coping strategies: 6.1% sought medical advice through online consultations, 15.7% increased their prescribed doses on their own and 39.3% used whatever medications were available without prescriptions, which was significantly associated with poor asthma control (χ²=29.29, p<0.01). Regression analysis revealed dose reduction was linked to worse control (β=-3.68, p=0.004), while refugee status and better adherence to medications predicted higher ACT scores (β=2.88, p<0.001; β=0.54, p=0.028).
conclusionsThis study highlights a considerable gap in asthma control during the ongoing war, despite the availability of healthcare services in times of urgent need. Many patients adopted coping strategies such as using whatever medications were available without prescriptions or independently increasing their prescribed doses. Enhancing patient education on proper asthma self-management and improving access to healthcare services, including telemedicine consultations, could play a crucial role in achieving better asthma control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.