Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41135877›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced research2026

Active polymerization regions of G and S monolignols show different temporal and spatial change patterns in the multicellular space during lignification and its inhibition of the fruit flesh.

Jiayue Jin, Yibo Liu, Weinan Huang, Zihan Cai, Di Wu, Wei Zeng, Yanna Shi, Xian Li, Kunsong Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jiayue JinCollege of Agriculture & Biotechnology, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Quality Improvement, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (Growth and Development), Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, PR China.
Yibo LiuCollege of Agriculture & Biotechnology, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Quality Improvement, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (Growth and Development), Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, PR China.
Weinan HuangCollege of Agriculture & Biotechnology, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Quality Improvement, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (Growth and Development), Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, PR China; College of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biosafety and Green Production of Upper Yangtze River (Ministry of Education), Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, PR China.
Zihan CaiCollege of Agriculture & Biotechnology, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Quality Improvement, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (Growth and Development), Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, PR China.
Di WuCollege of Agriculture & Biotechnology, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Quality Improvement, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (Growth and Development), Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, PR China; Zhejiang University Zhongyuan Institute, Zhengzhou 450000, PR China. Electronic address: di_wu@zju.edu.cn.
Wei ZengZhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation, College of Life Sciences, Taizhou University, Taizhou 318000, PR China.
Yanna ShiCollege of Agriculture & Biotechnology, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Quality Improvement, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (Growth and Development), Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, PR China.
Xian LiCollege of Agriculture & Biotechnology, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Quality Improvement, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (Growth and Development), Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, PR China.
Kunsong ChenCollege of Agriculture & Biotechnology, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Quality Improvement, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (Growth and Development), Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSome fruits are vulnerable to chilling lignification during cold storage. However, the active polymerization cell regions of guaiacyl (G) and sinapyl (S) lignin units in fruit flesh during lignification and their dynamic change patterns are unclear. We have visualized G-unit lignin in fruit flesh cells, but there is no method for imaging the active polymerization regions of S monolignol.

objectiveThis work aims to understand the cell dynamics mechanism of newly synthesized G- and S-unit lignin in fruit flesh during postharvest lignification from both accumulation and inhibition perspectives.

methodsA bioorthogonal chemical labeling method to label S-unit lignin in fruit flesh cells was established. Then, using loquat fruit as the research object, and the newly synthesized G- and S-unit lignin in loquat fruit flesh during postharvest lignification was visualized. Moreover, for the inhibition study, we prepared methyl jasmonate (MeJA) hydrogel beads that could continuously inhibit the lignification during postharvest storage.

resultsThe polymerization of G monolignol tended to be active in the middle lamella of the parenchyma cells during early storage, whereas the polymerization of S monolignol tended to be active in the cell corner during late storage. Besides, the change patterns of vascular bundles and lignified cells were different from the parenchyma cells. Furthermore, a hydrogel bead capable of continuously releasing MeJA was prepared and used to inhibit the lignification. Results demonstrated that the inhibitory effects on G- and S-unit lignin were concentrated on the parenchyma cells, and there were also spatiotemporally specific, whereas the effects on vascular bundles and lignified cells were limited.

conclusionThe newly synthesized S-unit lignin in fruit flesh was visualized for the first time. Distinct spatiotemporal polymerization patterns of G- and S-unit lignin were found during postharvest lignification and its inhibition, and the corresponding cellular model was proposed.

Indexed as

EriobotryaFruitGuaiacolLigninPhenylpropionatesAcetatesCell WallCyclopentanesOxylipinsPolymerizationAcetatesCyclopentanesGuaiacolguaiacyl monolignolLigninmethyl jasmonateOxylipinsPhenylpropionatesActive polymerization regionBioorthogonal chemical labelingFruitLignificationMonolignolPostharvest

Identifiers

PMID41135877
PMCPMC13316479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.