ArticleContemporary clinical trials2025
The TRaditional versus Early Aggressive Therapy for Multiple Sclerosis (TREAT-MS) trial: design and baseline characteristics of participants.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient profiling in relapsing multiple sclerosis: insights from a real-world observational study into the unmet medical needs of patients on disease-modifying therapy.Journal of neurology · 2026Observational
- Synthetic multi-inversion time magnetic resonance images for visualization of subcortical structures.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2026Article
- Controversy on the treatment of multiple sclerosis and related disorders: positional statement of the expert panel in charge of the 2021 DGN Guideline on diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum diseases and MOG-IgG-associated disorders.Neurological research and practice · 2021Review
- Commentary: The Multiple Sclerosis Controversy: Is It Escalation or Induction High Efficacy?Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020Article
- Serum neurofilament light chain in multiple sclerosis: from biological signal to clinically informed decision-making.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhether early use of higher-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (DMT) reduces later risk of disability in multiple sclerosis (MS) has not been studied as a prospective treatment strategy. Herein, we describe the TRaditional versus Early Aggressive Therapy for MS (TREAT-MS) trial design and provide the baseline characteristics of the enrolled population.
methodsTREAT-MS is a pragmatic, randomized, rater-blinded trial of DMT strategies in treatment-naive people aged 18-60 years with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Participants were randomized (1:1, stratified by site and long-term disability risk classification) to one of two treatment strategies: higher-efficacy or traditional DMT; the specific DMT within the assigned strategy was chosen by the clinician/patient pair. Participants could switch DMT for breakthrough disease occurring after 6 months on DMT. The primary outcome is sustained worsening of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)-plus, a composite endpoint that includes the EDSS and the timed 25-ft walk and 9-hole peg tests.
resultsTREAT-MS includes 900 people with the following baseline characteristics: mean age 36 ± 10 years; 629 (70 %) female gender; 648 (72 %) white, 168 (19 %) Black/African American race, and 105 (12 %) Hispanic or Latino. Mean time since MS symptom onset was 2.6 (± 4.5) years, and mean EDSS score was 2.5 (± 1.3).
conclusionTREAT-MS seeks to address how early DMT strategy influences MS disability and related outcomes. The results will be generalizable to future individuals newly diagnosed with RRMS who, with their clinicians, will be able to use them to make data-driven DMT decisions about how to maximize their intermediate-term function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.