ReviewAdvanced drug delivery reviews2025
Advanced adhesion and targeting strategies to prolong gut residence time and improve eLBP efficacy in colonic diseases.
Review in Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolic Engineering of ProbioticFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effects of microparticle composition on colony morphology and viability of encapsulated therapeutic yeast for oral delivery.RSC pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Hydrogel platforms for engineered live biotherapeutics: materials, microbial integration and clinical potential.RSC pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Engineered live biotherapeutic products (eLBPs) are genetically modified microorganisms being explored as a novel treatment modality for gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. The therapeutic potential is driven by their ability to selectively interact with host tissues while maintaining inherent probiotic properties that promote gut health. A key limitation of orally administered eLBPs is their poor competitive fitness against resident gut microbes, which often leads to rapid passage through the GI tract and reduced therapeutic efficacy. This challenge can be addressed by engineering eLBPs to extend their residence time in the gut and enhance the precision of therapeutic delivery at the target site. Targeted adhesion is a prevalent mechanism by which eLBPs achieve increased retention within the GI tract. Various targets in the colon have been used as anchors for non-resident microbes such as mucus, the extracellular matrix, and tumorous tissues. Additionally, a range of strategies have been explored for microbial targeting, including chemical surface modifications, genetically engineered surface display systems, metabolic engineering, and stimuli-responsive approaches. In this review, we provide insights into targets and targeting strategies that have been implemented in eLBP development and highlight the gaps that must be addressed to enhance eLBP efficacy through prolonged gut retention. We discuss the development of novel eLBP strains that target various components within healthy or diseased colon tissues for improved efficacy, particularly for inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer. We conclude by detailing perspectives on eLBP design for clinically viable and effective therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.