Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41135515›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2025

Logica: A likelihood framework for cross-ancestry local genetic correlation estimation using summary statistics.

Boran Gao, Zheng Li, Xiang Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Boran GaoDepartment of Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. Electronic address: gao824@purdue.edu.
Zheng LiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Xiang ZhouDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA. Electronic address: xiang.zhou.xz735@yale.edu.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Modeling Polygenic Architecture in Association and Re-sequencing StudiesR01HG009124 · NHGRI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Xiang Zhou · 2017 to 2026
$3.0M
DMS/NIGMS 2: Advanced Statistical Methods for Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics StudiesR01GM144960 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZHOU, XIANG · 2021 to 2024
$1.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG009124NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM144960Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding genetic architecture across ancestries through genetic correlation analysis is critical for determining the degree to which genetic factors underlying diseases or complex traits are shared or differ among populations. Current methods for genetic correlation analysis primarily rely on method of moments approaches and focus on estimating the global genetic correlation across the entire genome. However, these methods often overlook important local genomic complexities and inadequately model the intricate linkage disequilibrium (LD) structures that vary substantially across ancestries. Here, we present Logica (local genetic correlation across ancestries), a method specifically designed to estimate local genetic correlations across ancestries and in admixed populations. Logica employs a bivariate linear mixed model that explicitly accounts for diverse LD patterns across ancestries, operates on genome-wide association study summary statistics, and utilizes a maximum-likelihood framework for robust inference. An important by-product of Logica is a joint heritability test across ancestries that yields well-calibrated p values-an aspect that existing approaches often struggle with. We conducted comprehensive evaluations of Logica through realistic simulations and analyses of 13 complex traits from multiple biobanks. Simulations showed that Logica achieves improved accuracy in local genetic correlation estimation (with mean squared errors 2.23-4.13 times lower) and enhanced power for detecting genetically correlated regions (8%-40% increase with controlled false discovery rate [FDR] at 5%). In real data, Logica produced valid genetic correlation estimates across all genomic regions, whereas existing methods failed in 23%-39% of regions. Additionally, Logica exhibited better FDR control (14%-58% improvement), identifying genetically correlated regions with greater functional relevance.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyModels, GeneticComputer SimulationHumansLikelihood FunctionsLinkage DisequilibriumMultifactorial InheritancePolymorphism, Single Nucleotidecomplex traits and diseaseslocal genetic correlation

Identifiers

PMID41135515
PMCPMC12739644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.