ReviewJCO clinical cancer informatics2025
Large Language Models in Population Oncology: A Contemporary Review on the Use of Large Language Models to Support Data Collection, Aggregation, and Analysis in Cancer Care and Research.
Review in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Zero-Shot to Bedside: A Practical Playbook for Adapting Open-Source Large Language Models to Clinical Symptom Extraction.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past 5 years, large language models (LLMs) have emerged and continued to improve in their generative abilities and are now capable of generating human-understandable text and performing complex data analyses. As these models continue to improve in their capabilities, they are increasingly used to support population oncology, including clinical information extraction, cancer care education, and clinical decision support. This narrative review provides a high-level description of the use of LLMs in cancer with an overview of the current literature, along with research gaps. Despite increasing interest in using LLMs for cancer care, prevention, and research, applied methods in cancer still lag advancements published in the computer science literature. Therefore, we recommend that cancer-focused LLM research and applications better incorporate technical advancements and techniques found in the computer science literature. Additionally, standardized evaluation metrics and approaches need to be better studied and adopted in oncology, along with data governance and computational infrastructure to support state-of-the-art model integration and the use of real-world data. Finally, we describe the need for researchers to incorporate principles and frameworks from implementation and dissemination science to promote LLM-based tool adaptation, effectiveness, fit, and sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.