Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41134973›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2026

Two-stage Bayesian network meta-analysis of individualized treatment rules for multiple treatments with siloed data.

Junwei Shen, Erica Em Moodie, Shirin Golchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Junwei ShenDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0149-0550
Erica Em MoodieDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Shirin GolchiDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3382-9563

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individualized treatment rules leverage patient-level information to tailor treatments for individuals. Estimating these rules, with the goal of optimizing expected patient outcomes, typically relies on individual-level data to identify the variability in treatment effects across patient subgroups defined by different covariate combinations. To increase the statistical power for detecting treatment-covariate interactions and the generalizability of the findings, data from multisite studies are often used. However, sharing sensitive patient-level health data is sometimes restricted. Additionally, due to funding or time constraints, only a subset of available treatments can be included at each site, but an individualized treatment rule considering all treatments is desired. In this work, we adopt a two-stage Bayesian network meta-analysis approach to estimate individualized treatment rules for multiple treatments using multisite data without disclosing individual-level data beyond the sites. Simulation results demonstrate that our approach can provide consistent estimates of the parameters that fully characterize the optimal individualized treatment rule. We illustrate the method's application through an analysis of data from the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression study, the Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response for Clinical Care study, and the Research Evaluating the Value of Augmenting Medication with Psychotherapy study.

Indexed as

Network Meta-Analysis as TopicPrecision MedicineAntidepressive AgentsBayes TheoremComputer SimulationHumansAntidepressive AgentsBayesian meta-analysisindividualized treatment rulesmultisite studiesnetwork meta-analysispersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID41134973
PMCPMC12783382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.