ReviewScience progress
Multiple sclerosis: Glial cell activation - Biomarker advances and their translational significance.
Review in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) predominantly hinges on the 2017 McDonald criteria, integrated with adjunctive diagnostic modalities including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Notwithstanding their utility, these established methods exhibit inherent limitations in fully elucidating the complex histopathological transformations characteristic of MS. Specifically, they encounter difficulties in precisely quantifying and standardizing patient-specific pathological features, and often lack the requisite precision to delineate the disease's nuanced pathological hallmarks. Recent advancements in neuroimaging, biomarker discovery, and genomic profiling have yielded substantial evidence implicating glial cell activation as a central pathogenic mechanism in MS. In particular, the activation of astrocytes and microglia has been shown to play a pivotal role in disease progression, precipitating a cascade of events that culminate in neuronal axonal demise. The identification of distinct glial cell subsets represents a critical step towards the development of targeted therapeutic strategies. Biomarker-based approaches offer a powerful paradigm for in-vivo interrogation of disease processes, facilitating a more comprehensive understanding of MS pathophysiology and potentially paving the way for personalized treatment modalities. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current research on the pathophysiology of glial cells in MS, emphasizing newly identified biomarkers with potential value related to the damage of microglia and astrocytes in MS in recent years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.