ArticlePloS one2025
Key body size/shape predictors of physical fitness in Saudi College-aged males: Role of the body roundness index.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association between body roundness index and cardiopulmonary fitness: a cross-sectional study of children and adolescents aged 7-18 years in Mainland China.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physical fitness, a crucial factor in health and well-being, is influenced by an individual's body composition. This study aimed to identify the key body size/shape predictors of fitness test performances among university-level students with diverse weight categories. This cross-sectional study involved 495 healthy, recreationally active male university students aged 18-23 years, categorized into normal weight (NORMW, n = 256), overweight (OVERW; n = 156), and obese (OB; n = 124) groups based on their body mass index (BMI). Anthropometric measurements including weight, height, BMI, waist and hip circumference (WC and HC), waist-to-hip and waist-to-height ratios (WHR and WHtR), body roundness and shape body indexes (BRI and ABSI) were recorded. The shuttle-run, push-ups, 20m Multi-Stage shuttle-run, and sit-and-reach tests were performed. The OB and OVERW groups performed significantly lower fitness test performances than the NORMW group (medium-to-large effect size). The correlation matrix showed that all anthropometric measures correlated with test performances, except for the sit-and-reach in the OB group and the shuttle-run in the NORW group. Higher WHtR and HC improved shuttle-run performance predictability in the OB group (R2 = -0.29), while WC and HC, and WC and BMI improved push-up predictability in the OB (R2 = -0.38) and OVERW (R2 = -0.24) groups. BRI was the best indicator of VO2max performance, accounting for 56%, 42%, and 32% of its variance in OB, OVERW, and NORMW groups, respectively. The BRI is proposed as a potential alternative to BMI for evaluating cardiorespiratory endurance performance, enabling individual monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.