Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41134865›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Evaluating the Cauchy combination test for count data.

Huda Alsulami, Silvia Liverani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Huda AlsulamiSchool of Mathematical Sciences/Centre for Probability, Statistics and Data Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, England, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9309-0655
Silvia LiveraniSchool of Mathematical Sciences/Centre for Probability, Statistics and Data Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, England, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Cauchy combination test (CCT) is a p-value combination method used in multiple-hypothesis testing and is robust under dependence structures. This study aims to evaluate the CCT for independent and correlated count data where the individual p-values are derived from tests based on normal approximation to the negative binomial distribution. The correlated count data are modelled via copula methods. The CCT performance is evaluated in a simulation study to assess the type 1 error rate and the statistical power, and compare it with existing methods. Our results indicate that the number of combined tests, the negative binomial success parameter, and sample size significantly affect the type 1 error rate of the CCT under independence or moderate correlation. The CCT has more control over managing the type 1 error rate as the strength increases in the Gumbel-Hougaard copula. In general, the choice of copula and the strength of its correlation have a significant influence on type 1 error rates for both the CCT and MinP tests. Our simulation findings support the broader applications of the CCT under multivariate copulas that model upper-tail dependence with higher correlations. This knowledge may have significant implications for practical applications.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumans

Identifiers

PMID41134865
PMCPMC12551897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.