Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41134858›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Feasibility study of a sensor-to-segment calibration method to enhance upper limb motion analysis using an IMU-based system for clinical and home environments.

Alessandra Favata, Arnau Marzabal-Gatell, Josep M Font-Llagunes, Rosa Pàmies-Vilà

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alessandra FavataDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Institute for Research and Innovation in Health (IRIS), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - BarcelonaTech (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0998-3739
Arnau Marzabal-GatellDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Institute for Research and Innovation in Health (IRIS), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - BarcelonaTech (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.
Josep M Font-LlagunesDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Institute for Research and Innovation in Health (IRIS), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - BarcelonaTech (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7192-2980
Rosa Pàmies-VilàDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Institute for Research and Innovation in Health (IRIS), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - BarcelonaTech (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3814-9199

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) represent a valid alternative to standard clinical assessment methods, such as clinical scales, for evaluating upper limb kinematics. A key aspect of utilizing IMUs effectively is ensuring precise sensor-to-segment calibration, which accounts for the relative orientation between the sensor and the attached body segment. This calibration is crucial to obtain accurate results. Although reliable calibration methods are available, their application in clinical and home environments remains challenging due to their complexity. This study aimed to validate a picture-based calibration method feasible for a clinical context and compare it against other standard methods. Ten healthy subjects performed daily activity tasks while upper limb kinematics was recorded using an optoelectronic motion capture system and an IMU-based system. Four calibration methods were compared using error metrics, including root mean square deviation (RMSD) and cross-correlation (XCORR). The results demonstrate that the proposed picture-based method provides highly accurate measurements for the first and second Euler rotation angles of the shoulder, with RMSD < 15° and XCORR > 0.75 across most of the tasks. For the elbow joint, all calibration methods consistently yielded precise results for the first rotation (RMSD < 15° and XCORR > 0.95) across the majority of tasks. The proposed sensor-to-segment calibration method improves the accuracy of upper limb motion data recorded with an IMU-based system compared to traditional methods. Moreover, the calibration approach is easy to use, making it suitable for clinical and home environments.

Indexed as

Upper ExtremityAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaCalibrationFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMovementRange of Motion, ArticularYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41134858
PMCPMC12551884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.