ArticlePloS one2025
Feasibility study of a sensor-to-segment calibration method to enhance upper limb motion analysis using an IMU-based system for clinical and home environments.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Motion-Driven Automatic IMU Orientation Calibration viaSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- IMU-based workspace area as a promising complementary tool to assess upper limb function in Neuromuscular diseases: A one-year follow-up.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) represent a valid alternative to standard clinical assessment methods, such as clinical scales, for evaluating upper limb kinematics. A key aspect of utilizing IMUs effectively is ensuring precise sensor-to-segment calibration, which accounts for the relative orientation between the sensor and the attached body segment. This calibration is crucial to obtain accurate results. Although reliable calibration methods are available, their application in clinical and home environments remains challenging due to their complexity. This study aimed to validate a picture-based calibration method feasible for a clinical context and compare it against other standard methods. Ten healthy subjects performed daily activity tasks while upper limb kinematics was recorded using an optoelectronic motion capture system and an IMU-based system. Four calibration methods were compared using error metrics, including root mean square deviation (RMSD) and cross-correlation (XCORR). The results demonstrate that the proposed picture-based method provides highly accurate measurements for the first and second Euler rotation angles of the shoulder, with RMSD < 15° and XCORR > 0.75 across most of the tasks. For the elbow joint, all calibration methods consistently yielded precise results for the first rotation (RMSD < 15° and XCORR > 0.95) across the majority of tasks. The proposed sensor-to-segment calibration method improves the accuracy of upper limb motion data recorded with an IMU-based system compared to traditional methods. Moreover, the calibration approach is easy to use, making it suitable for clinical and home environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.