Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41134852›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Screening mild cognitive impairment using aspects of personal, social, and functional lifestyle: Machine Learning Approaches.

Kyle Masato Ishikawa, Matthew Uechi, Hyeong Jun Ahn, Eunjung Lim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kyle Masato IshikawaDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4181-8648
Matthew UechiDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America.
Hyeong Jun AhnDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America.
Eunjung LimDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America.

Funding

The Role of gp120 on Cardiovascular Disease in People Living with HIVU54MD007601 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI JoAnn Umilani Tsark · 2017 to 2026
$59.5M
Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM138062 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI SY, ANGELA U · 2021 to 2025
$15.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM138062NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD007601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMild cognitive impairment (MCI) signals cognitive decline beyond normal aging and increases dementia risk. Early identification enables preventative interventions, yet many patients in primary care go undetected. This study examines whether machine learning (ML) models can predict MCI using routinely collected personal, social, and functional lifestyle factors and identifies the most important predictors.

methodsData from round 2 and 3 of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project was used, including 4,586 older adults with complete Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores. Predictors included demographics, childhood experiences, health behaviors, psychosocial measures, and functional difficulties. Eight ML models-including elastic net, multivariate adaptive regression splines, random forest, oblique random forest, boosted trees, decision trees, and a stacked ensemble-were trained and tuned using repeated cross-validation, with 20% of the dataset withheld for final testing. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and Matthew's correlation coefficient (MCC).

resultsMost models achieved good discrimination (AUROC > 0.8), with the stacked ensemble performing best (AUROC = 0.823; MCC = 0.462). The best individual model was logistic regression (AUROC = 0.818). Across models, key predictors of MCI included age, ethnicity, functional difficulties, social disconnectedness, and perceived stress. DISCUSSION: Logistic regression outperformed more complex machine learning models, providing the best combination of predictive accuracy and interpretability for identifying MCI. Across models, age, ethnicity, functional difficulties, social disconnectedness, and stress consistently emerged as key predictors, highlighting their central role in cognitive health. These findings suggest that psychosocial and functional measures can serve as practical indicators for those who need to be screened early for MCI, offering an opportunity for timely intervention and support. However, future work should include longitudinal data and clinical diagnoses to validate and refine these predictive tools.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionLife StyleMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID41134852
PMCPMC12551902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.