ArticlePloS one2025
A multi-epitope vaccine targeting a key virulence factor ClfA: An In-silico approach to combat Staphylococcus aureus infections.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pangenome-GuidedPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Design of a multi-epitope Staphylococcus aureus vaccine integrating a protein A variant, α-hemolysin, and fibronectin-binding protein A through reverse vaccinology.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus, a gram-positive opportunistic pathogen, presents a growing global threat due to the rise of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains. To counter this, we designed a multi-epitope vaccine (MEV) targeting the ClfA virulence protein using an integrative in silico approach. Sixty-one conserved epitopes (19 CTL, 36 HTL, 6 LBL) were selected based on antigenicity, immunogenicity, non-toxicity, and lack of homology to human proteins. These epitopes demonstrated strong HLA-binding affinities and over 50% global population coverage, indicating broad immunological applicability. Molecular docking revealed the strongest binding between the MEV and TLR4, with a ΔG of -17.1 kcal/mol and an exceptionally low dissociation constant (2.6 × 10 ⁻ ¹² M). HADDOCK 2.4-supported docking scores corroborated these results. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and MM/GBSA analysis further assessed the structural behavior of the MEV in complex with TLR2, TLR3, and TLR4. While TLR2 and TLR3 complexes showed greater structural stability (RMSF ~0.2-0.5 nm), the TLR4 complex exhibited higher flexibility (RMSF ~2.5 nm) but yielded the most favorable binding free energy (ΔG = -174.41 kcal/mol), suggesting stronger overall interaction. The TLR2-vaccine complex formed ~370-400 hydrogen bonds on average, while the unbound vaccine maintained ~60-70 internal hydrogen bonds, confirming structural integrity. Radius of gyration (Rg) and solvent-accessible surface area (SASA) analyses revealed that TLR2 and TLR3 binding induced compact and stable structures, whereas the TLR4 complex was more solvent-exposed and flexible. Disulfide bond engineering (VAL32-THR37 and PHE45-ASN64) enhanced vaccine stability, further supported by favorable physicochemical parameters (MW 54.67 kDa, pI 7.78, instability index 19.78). The low eigenvalue (3.63 × 10 ⁻ ⁶) indicated high structural mobility, associated with efficient energy absorption. Codon optimization (GC content 53.33%, CAI 0.96) predicted high expression potential in E. coli, and in silico cloning was successfully performed using the pET-28a(+) vector. Immune simulation demonstrated robust humoral and cellular responses, including elevated levels of IgM, IgG1, IFN-γ, and increased B and T cell populations. Collectively, these findings suggest that the designed MEV is structurally stable, immunogenic, and capable of eliciting a potent immune response, with TLR4 emerging as a promising innate immune target. Further experimental validation and in vivo studies are essential to confirm its efficacy and safety as a vaccine candidate against S. aureus infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.