ArticlePloS one2025
Enhancing healthcare equity by using open-source pediatric medical devices in low resource settings: An exploratory international survey of pediatric clinicians.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children in low-resource settings suffer from a high burden of treatable diseases that could be addressed with contextually appropriate technologies. However, numerous barriers to providing such technology to children in these settings exist. We propose that using open-source medical devices, where any qualified operator can freely make, modify, or distribute a product, may be a viable strategy to increase access to medical therapies in low-resource settings. However, given the novelty of open-source models, we sought to conduct an exploratory global survey on the perspectives and opinions of medical providers on the feasibility of this approach. Among 101 surveys completed by providers representing 34 countries, we found that the majority (89%) of respondents lacked experience working with open-source devices in low-resource settings; many respondents felt comfortable with providing an open-source pediatric medical device in a low-resource setting; lack of funding was the most significant barrier to successfully deploying these technologies; locally identified need was the most important factor to consider when conducting such projects; and respondents from the USA found no ethical issues with implementing open-source devices in low-resource settings, but respondents from outside the USA did find ethical issues with the same work. Our survey shows that most respondents in relevant specialties did not have experience working in either pediatric global health or with open-source medical devices in low-resource settings. Our survey may have revealed a potential unexplored frontier in addressing inequities in health care by enhancing access to equipment and technologies in areas of the world with the highest burdens of treatable pediatric disease, while also identifying ethical and cultural obstacles that warrant consideration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.