Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41134828›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Trends and characteristics during 17 years of naloxone distribution and administration through an overdose prevention program in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Nabarun Dasgupta, Alice Bell, Malcolm Visnich, Maya Doe-Simkins, Eliza Wheeler, Adams L Sibley, Maryalice Nocera, Amy E Seitz, Dorothy Chang, Summer Barlow and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nabarun DasguptaUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4098-605X
Alice BellPrevention Point Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Malcolm VisnichPrevention Point Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Maya Doe-SimkinsRemedy Alliance For The People, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Eliza WheelerRemedy Alliance For The People, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Adams L SibleyUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Maryalice NoceraUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Amy E SeitzUS Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Dorothy ChangUS Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Summer BarlowUS Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9617-6872
Zachary D W DezmanUS Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Jana K McAninchUS Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDescribe time trends during 17.5 years of community-based naloxone distribution.

methodsAnalysis of administrative records from a harm reduction program in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, collected during encounters for overdose education, naloxone dispensing and refills. Monthly time trends were analyzed using segmented regression. Programmatic context aided interpretation of quantitative findings. We also evaluated impacts of 2014 state legislation loosening naloxone prescribing requirements and providing Good Samaritan protections.

resultsFrom July 2005 to January 2023 there were 16,904 service encounters by 7,582 unique participants, resulting in 70,234 naloxone doses dispensed, with 5,521 overdose response events (OREs), utilizing 8,756 naloxone doses. After legislation, new participants increased from 10.4 to 65.9 per month. New participants tended to be older (46 vs. 37 years), female (58% to 35%), White race, and more likely to be family/friends as opposed to people who use drugs themselves. Consequently, ORE per participant fell from 1.46 to 0.47 in the year after enactment. On average, 1.63 (95% CI: 1.60, 1.65) naloxone doses were administered per ORE, which did not change substantially over 17 years (χ2 = 0.28, 3 df, p = 0.60) during evolution from prescription opioids, to heroin, to illicitly manufactured fentanyl. In 98.0% of OREs the person who experienced overdose "was okay", i.e., survived. Emergency medical services were called in 16% of OREs overall, but <7% since 2019. There were 106 more emesis events per 1,000 OREs with 4 mg nasal spray compared to intramuscular injection; and 48 per 1,000 more reports of anger. Titration of intramuscular naloxone was associated with lower rates of adverse events.

conclusionsWhile state legislation created the environment for expansion, reaching previously underserved communities required intentional new programmatic development and outreach. Long-term consistency of <2 doses per ORE, high survival rate, and robust utilization all lend confidence in prioritizing naloxone distribution directly to people who use drugs and their social networks. Trial registration: This investigation was pre-registered https://osf.io/b2f4h.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsAdultFemaleHarm ReductionHumansMaleMiddle AgedPennsylvaniaYoung AdultNaloxoneNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID41134828
PMCPMC12551907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.