ArticlePloS one2025
Knowledge and personal values on fertility preservation procedures in Korean women.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fertility preservation in women with cancer: shared decision-making and the essential role of nurses.Women's health nursing (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to identify the knowledge of young general Korean female population on reproductive aging, as well as to investigate the personal values regarding fertility preservation (FP). A cross-sectional online survey study of 500 Korean female population on reproductive aging (18-40 years old) was performed. Knowledge regarding fertility preservation and its procedures was generally low. Correct knowledge about FP procedures was less than 50% for most of the questions. The rate of incorrect answers regarding FP knowledge overpassed 50%, which were related to loss of fertility and birth defects due to cancer treatment, and the rate of successful pregnancy for egg and embryo freezing. We also identified the personal values that influenced the willingness of women to undergo FP procedures. These included the following: 1) pregnancy success rate; 2) side effects of FP procedures; 3) delay of cancer treatment due to FP procedure; 4) risk of cancer recurrence; and 5) medical costs of FP procedures. Over 80% of the participants considered all five values important, with almost no distinctions. Despite the general awareness of FP, this study highlights the lack of knowledge and significant misconceptions regarding FP relative to fertility and cancer treatment among Korean women, which should be addressed properly with targeted education. Additionally, this study demonstrates diverse personal values participants hold regarding FP and the desire their values to be respected during the decision-making process of FP procedure facilitating shared decision-making (SDM).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.