ArticlePloS one2025
Intended and experienced literacy practices in a Swedish undergraduate nursing education.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcademic literacy in higher education has been widely studied, but less attention has been given to literacy practices within professional programmes such as nursing education. This study aimed to analyze one Swedish undergraduate nursing programme regarding the presence of academic and professional literacy, and secondarily to explore students' note-taking as a component of literacy practices.
methodsThe study employed a descriptive and exploratory design, analyzing curriculum documents and surveying nursing students. An analysis of the intended curriculum (course syllabi) of a three-year undergraduate nursing programme at Karolinska Institutet was conducted to identify explicit and implicit literacy components. A digital questionnaire focusing on note-taking practices was distributed to second-semester students (n = 67; response rate 40%). Closed questions were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while open-ended responses underwent qualitative content analysis.
resultsThe curriculum analysis demonstrated that academic literacy was primarily addressed through scientific writing, group projects, and thesis work, particularly in the first two and final two semesters. Professional literacy was integrated across all semesters and included communication with patients, families, and interprofessional teams, documentation, and interpretation of professional texts. Surveyed students reported frequent note-taking, primarily during lectures and prior to examinations, using both pen and paper and digital devices, with a preference for pen and paper. Qualitative data indicated that students use note-taking mainly to support memorization, understanding, and exam preparation, with limited focus on professional literacy needs.
conclusionThe nursing curriculum integrates both academic and professional literacy practices, although with different emphases across the study period. Students' current note-taking practices are predominantly academically oriented. These findings highlight the need for more explicit integration and scaffolding of both academic and professional literacy throughout nursing education to better prepare students for their future professional roles, i.e., for clinical communication, documentation, and interprofessional collaboration essential to safe and effective patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.