ArticlePloS one2025
Mechanisms of multi-species mealybug invasions in Hainan Island of China: Integrating niche, distribution, and habitat drivers.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating Environmental Drivers and Trophic Interactions to Predict Spatial Distribution of High-Risk Marine Organisms at Nuclear Power Plant Cooling Water Intake.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mealybugs, highly invasive pests causing global agricultural damage, threaten China's tropical Hainan Island-a critical biosecurity zone. This study investigates spatial patterns, interspecific interactions, and environmental drivers of 15 invasive mealybug species using integrated ecological niche modeling (Maxent), niche/range overlap analyses, Joint Species Distribution Models (JSDM), and Structural Equation Models (SEM). Our research revealed that a strong coastal-inland richness gradient emerged, where humid tropical climates and monoculture plantations supported 11-15 species in eastern coasts, whereas topographic complexity limited invasions to 0-5 species in forested mountains. In parallel, high niche overlap (I ≥ 0.67) among species reflected climate-mediated thermal tolerance and habitat-driven broad host preferences. Range overlap patterns diverged: high-overlap pairs (e.g., Planococcus minor and Paracoccus marginatus, I > 0.8) coexisted via adaptation to 24-28°C and generalist hosts, whereas low-overlap pairs (e.g., Icerya purchasi and Phenacoccus nigra, I = 0.37) segregated through host specificity. Mechanistically, JSDM confirmed these patterns, revealing competitive exclusion where resource overlap and thermal adaptation divergence occurred (e.g., P. marginatus vs. Dysmicoccus brevipes), versus coexistence promoted by host specialization (e.g., Ceroplastes psidii's rubber tree specificity versus P. marginatus's generalism), reproductive strategy divergence (parthenogenesis vs. seasonal outbreaks), and external environmental factors. Ultimately, SEM analyses and Linear regression identified significant positive correlations between habitat conditions and species suitability (R² = 0.71, p < 0.001), with habitat type as the dominant driver (total effect = 0.48), where climate and topography indirectly regulated suitability through habitat characteristics (e.g., elevation, latitude) while pest-infested areas directly enhanced suitability (path coefficient = 0.24). Our research framework elucidates multi-species invasion assembly mechanisms, new insights and theoretical support for the management of 15 invasive mealybug species, providing a solid foundation for optimizing future species distribution models, and validating the methodological value of integrated modeling (JSDM-SEM) in disentangling invasion complexities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.