ArticlePloS one2025
Sequencing Therapy for Optimal Response in Mirikizumab (STORM)-study: A tertiary referral center study on patients with therapy-refractory ulcerative colitis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interleukin-23 Inhibitors in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026Review
- Interleukin-23p19 Inhibitors in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: From Current Insights to Future Directions.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Long-term real-world effectiveness and safety of mirikizumab in ulcerative colitis: 52-Week results from an expanded international two-center retrospective cohort study.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOptimized drug sequencing is an emerging area of interest in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Comparative real-world data on treatment response to mirikizumab in a cohort with exposure to multiple biologic agents, particularly tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-naïve versus TNF-treated patients, remain limited. This study evaluated the therapeutic response to mirikizumab treatment in a cohort of patients with UC who were refractory to biologic therapy.
methodsConsecutive patients with UC treated with mirikizumab between July 01, 2023, and May 31, 2025, at a tertiary university referral center were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was 12-week clinical remission. The secondary endpoints included clinical remission and biochemical remission between weeks 24 and 50 and between weeks 60 and 80.
resultsThis study included 52 patients. Among them, 17 (32.7%) had previous exposure to ≥3 biologic agents/small molecules. The 12-week clinical remission rate was 35 of 52 patients (67.3%). There was a significant association between the treatment duration and clinical and biochemical remission. The likelihood of achieving clinical remission was 5.583 times higher after 12 weeks of intravenous mirikizumab treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 5.583, p = 0.002). Anti-TNF pretreatment had a positive effect on biochemical remission (OR = 3.489, p = 0.021). Janus kinase inhibitor pretreatment had a negative effect on clinical remission (OR = 0.19, p = 0.019).
conclusionMirikizumab treatment had good short- and long-term efficacy in patients with UC who previously received biologic therapy. In particular, patients with prior anti-TNF therapies had favorable biochemical remission outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.