Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41134730›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of nephrology2025

Evaluating Urinary Biomarkers for Early Detection of Kidney Damage in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors-Treated Patients.

Alfredo G Casanova, Javier Tascón, Edel Del Barco, Alejandro Olivares, Tránsito Carretero, Milagros Hijas, Ana C Sánchez-Sierra, Elena Villanueva-Sánchez, Moisés Pescador, Marta Prieto and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alfredo G CasanovaUnidad de Toxicología. Departamento de Fisiología y Farmacología, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Javier TascónUnidad de Toxicología. Departamento de Fisiología y Farmacología, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Edel Del BarcoInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
Alejandro OlivaresInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
Tránsito CarreteroInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
Milagros HijasServicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Ana C Sánchez-SierraServicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Elena Villanueva-SánchezInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
Moisés PescadorUnidad de Toxicología. Departamento de Fisiología y Farmacología, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Marta PrietoUnidad de Toxicología. Departamento de Fisiología y Farmacología, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Laura Vicente-VicenteUnidad de Toxicología. Departamento de Fisiología y Farmacología, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Ana I MoralesUnidad de Toxicología. Departamento de Fisiología y Farmacología, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved cancer treatment; however, their use can be limited by immune-mediated adverse events, such as kidney damage. Diagnostic limitations of nephrotoxicity may lead to worsening of the patient's prognosis. This study aimed to validate a panel of urinary biomarkers as diagnostic tools for kidney damage in patients treated with ICIs.

methodsA prospective study was conducted on patients scheduled to receive ICIs. Those who subsequently developed kidney damage were considered cases; and those who did not were considered controls. A battery of biomarkers was assessed in urine samples at PRE-1, before the first treatment cycle; PRE-3, before the third cycle; and POST-3, 1 week after the third treatment cycle.

resultsA total of 46 patients participated in the study. At PRE-1, increased urinary excretion of IGFBP7, NAG, TIMP-2 × IGFBP7, and transferrin was observed in the case group, suggesting that these markers could be useful for early risk stratification of developing kidney damage. Furthermore, increased urinary excretion of albumin and NGAL was observed at PRE-3, suggesting that these markers could be of diagnostic utility to identify patients that could develop kidney damage once treatment is initiated. All of the aforementioned biomarkers demonstrated significant discriminatory ability between cases and controls, as verified by ROC curve analysis.

conclusionThe proposed biomarker battery could be used as a preventive tool for decision-making in the management of oncology patients at risk for kidney damage associated with ICIs. Furthermore, its use would allow personalized adjustment of therapy that would minimize the probability of renal complications even before starting the first cycle of treatment.

Indexed as

BiomarkersEarly diagnosisImmune checkpoint inhibitorsKidney damagePersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID41134730
PMCPMC12707895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.