Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41134698›Full record

ArticlePlant signaling & behavior2025

Unveiling the dual role of

Huldah Pearlin Sarah Lazarus, Nalini Easwaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant signaling & behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Huldah Pearlin Sarah LazarusSchool of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0009-0002-6943-5582
Nalini EaswaranSchool of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To increase yield and productivity, plants are treated with chemicals; however, these interventions have inadvertently contributed to a decline in food security. To mitigate these challenges, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs), which increase yield, have been widely used to modulate plant immunity. Some PGPRs have recently been reported to exhibit opportunistic pathogenicity in humans, raising safety concerns regarding their widespread application. Membrane vesicles (MVs) derived from PGPR may retain similar plant growth-promoting (PGP) traits and thus could aid in plant protection. This research tests the hypothesis that MVs derived from the PGPR

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsImmunologic FactorsImmunomodulating AgentsPlant DiseasesPseudomonas syringaeAnti-Infective AgentsImmunologic FactorsImmunomodulating Agentsantimicrobialcrop protectionimmunomodulatormembrane vesicles (MVs)P. megaterium VIT-2021

Identifiers

PMID41134698
PMCPMC12562726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.