Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41134662›Full record

ReviewCritical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology

Ubiquitin and SUMO pathways in DNA replication and replication-coupled repair.

Lidia M Fiedorowicz, Ryan M Baxley, Eric A Hendrickson, Anja Katrin Bielinsky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Post-Translational Modifications in Traumatic Brain Injury: Decoding the Proteomic Landscape and Molecular Mechanisms of Secondary Injury.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lidia M FiedorowiczDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Ryan M BaxleyMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Eric A HendricksonDepartment of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Anja Katrin BielinskyDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Funding

Mechanistic insight into genome stability pathwaysR35GM141805 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Anja-Katrin Bielinsky · 2021 to 2026
$2.9M
POLQ- and CtIP-regulated telomere fusions and translocations are involved in early events in carcinogenesisR01CA266524 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HENDRICKSON, ERIC A · 2022 to 2025
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA266524NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM141805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and efficient DNA replication constitutes the most effective safeguard against genome instability. Numerous aspects of replication initiation, elongation, and termination are tightly regulated by post-translational modifications. In this review, we summarize recent advances in elucidating pathways regulated by ubiquitin and the small ubiquitin-like modifier, SUMO, and compare insights gained in yeast with those obtained in vertebrate systems. These reversible modifications play critical roles in both DNA replication and replication-coupled repair processes. When active replisomes encounter obstacles such as nucleotide depletion, DNA secondary structures, or base lesions that impede fork progression, multiple genome surveillance pathways are activated to coordinate the replication stress response. Stalled replication forks undergo remodeling and reversal, thereby stabilizing the fork and facilitating replication restart. In parallel, diverse tolerance mechanisms have evolved to enable lesion bypass or replication traverse, which transiently alters the replication machinery yet permits continuation of DNA synthesis. At the core of these processes are the DNA damage tolerance and Fanconi anemia pathways, whose components collaborate to prevent under-replication during S phase and beyond. Furthermore, ubiquitin and SUMO signaling act synergistically through the activity of SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases. These enzymes sequester damaged replication forks at the nuclear periphery and promote recombination-mediated restart under stringent spatiotemporal control of the replication checkpoint. Failure of these mechanisms forces the cell to engage in a final, "do-or-die" attempt to initiate DNA synthesis during mitosis, a process that is also orchestrated by ubiquitin signaling.

Indexed as

DNA RepairDNA ReplicationSmall Ubiquitin-Related Modifier ProteinsUbiquitinHumansMetabolic Networks and PathwaysSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSumoylationSmall Ubiquitin-Related Modifier ProteinsUbiquitinDNA damage toleranceDNA replicationFanconi anemiamitotic DNA synthesisPCNASUMOSUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligasesubiquitin

Identifiers

PMID41134662
PMCPMC12779147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.