Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41134625›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Improving outbreak forecasts through model augmentation.

Graham C Gibson, Spencer J Fox, Emily Javan, Susan E Ptak, Oluwasegun M Ibrahim, Michael Lachmann, Lauren Ancel Meyers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Graham C Gibson *Computing and Artificial Intelligence Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87544.
Spencer J Fox *Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.ORCID 0000-0003-1969-3778
Emily JavanIntegrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.ORCID 0000-0002-6008-0271
Susan E PtakIntegrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.ORCID 0009-0002-1206-4557
Oluwasegun M IbrahimIntegrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.ORCID 0000-0002-2971-4301
Michael LachmannSanta Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501.ORCID 0000-0002-1086-9717
Lauren Ancel MeyersIntegrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.ORCID 0000-0002-5828-8874

Funding

CDC HHS NU38OT000297HHS | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 23NU38FT000008HHS | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) U01IP001136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate forecasts of disease outbreaks are critical for effective public health responses, management of healthcare surge capacity, and communication of public risk. There are a growing number of powerful forecasting methods that fall into two broad categories-empirical models that extrapolate from historical data, and mechanistic models based on fixed epidemiological assumptions. However, these methods often underperform precisely when reliable predictions are most urgently needed-during periods of rapid epidemic escalation. Here, we introduce epimodulation, a hybrid approach that integrates fundamental epidemiological principles into existing predictive models to enhance forecasting accuracy, especially around epidemic peaks. When applied to empirical and machine learning forecasting methods (Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average, Holt-Winters, gradient-boosting machines, Prophet, and spline models), epimodulation improved overall prediction accuracy by an average of 12.3% (range: 8.5 to 18.7%) for COVID-19 hospital admissions and by 32.9% (range: 24.2 to 43.7%) for influenza hospital admissions; accuracy during epidemic peaks improved even further, by an average of 27.9% and 43.8%, respectively. Epimodulation also substantially enhanced the performance of complex forecasting methods, including the COVID-19 Forecast Hub ensemble model, demonstrating its broad utility in improving forecast reliability at critical moments in disease outbreaks.

Indexed as

COVID-19Disease OutbreaksEpidemiological ModelsInfluenza, HumanForecastingHumansMachine LearningModels, StatisticalSARS-CoV-2bias correctionCOVID-19influenzaoutbreak forecasting

Identifiers

PMID41134625
PMCPMC12582271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.