ArticleJAMA network open2025
Syndromic Analysis of Sepsis Cohorts Using Large Language Models.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward precision risk stratification: predicting in-hospital death in sepsis patients with MRSA bacteremia.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Large language models in emergency and critical care medicine: a comprehensive review of applications, challenges, and future directions.Burns & trauma · 2026Review
- Supporting complex mental health care and services research today and beyond: a mini-review of real-world evidence strategies and informed approaches.Frontiers in health services · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-assisted phenotyping of sepsis: Research progress, clinical challenges, and translational prospects.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Presenting signs and symptoms affect the care of patients with possible sepsis. However, signs and symptoms are not incorporated into most large observational studies because they are difficult to extract from clinical notes at scale. Objective: To assess the use of large language models (LLMs) to extract presenting signs and symptoms from admission notes and characterize their associations with infectious diagnoses, multidrug-resistant infections, and mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study obtained data from 5 Massachusetts hospitals within 1 health care system between June 1, 2015, and August 1, 2022. Participants were hospitalized adult patients with possible infection (determined by blood culture drawn and intravenous antibiotics administered within 24 hours of arrival). An LLM (LLaMA 3 8B; Meta) was used to extract up to 10 presenting signs and symptoms from each patient's history-and-physical admission notes. LLM-generated labels were validated by blinded review of 303 random admission notes. Data analyses were performed from July 2023 to August 2025. Exposures: Thirty most common signs and symptoms were retained as exposures, and unsupervised clustering was used to create syndromes, which were compared with infection sources derived from the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification discharge codes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included positive cultures for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), positive cultures for multidrug-resistant gram-negative (MDRGN) organisms, and in-hospital mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for demographics, comorbidities, physiologic markers of severity of illness, and time to antibiotics. Results: Among the 104 248 patients (median [IQR] age, 66 [52-78] years; 54 137 males [51.9%]) included, 23 619 (22.7%) had sepsis without shock, 25 990 (24.9%) had septic shock, and 94 913 (91.0%) had 1 or more admission note within 24 hours. The LLM labeled the notes of 93 674 of 94 913 patients (98.7%). On manual validation, LLM labels had an accuracy of 99.3% (95% CI, 99.2%-99.3%), balanced accuracy of 84.6% (95% CI, 83.5%-85.8%), positive predictive value of 68.4% (95% CI, 66.0%-70.7%), sensitivity of 69.7% (95% CI, 67.3%-72.0%), and specificity of 99.6% (95% CI, 99.6%-99.6%) compared with the physician medical record reviewer. The 30 most common signs and symptoms were clustered into syndromes that correlated with infection sources. Presence of skin and soft tissue symptoms (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.73; 95% CI, 1.49-2.00) and absence of gastrointestinal (AOR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.54-0.73) or urinary tract symptoms (AOR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.22-0.50) were associated with MRSA culture positivity; inverse associations were seen for MDRGN organisms. Cardiopulmonary symptoms were associated with increased mortality (AOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.17-1.45). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that an LLM accurately extracted presenting signs and symptoms from admission notes that clustered into syndromes differentially correlated with infection sources, multidrug-resistant infections, and mortality. Further research is warranted to evaluate the value of large-scale sign-and-symptom data in models of antibiotic choice, effectiveness, and outcomes in patients with possible sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.