Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41134517›Full record

ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2025

What is New in Contact Allergy To Cosmetics for Physicians, Cosmetologists, and Cosmetic Users?

Thanisorn Sukakul, Cecilia Svedman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thanisorn SukakulDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Jan Waldenströmsgatan 16, pl. 5, Malmö, 20502, Sweden. thanisorn.sukakul@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5351-2988
Cecilia SvedmanDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Jan Waldenströmsgatan 16, pl. 5, Malmö, 20502, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis paper aims to evaluate the burden of contact allergy caused by cosmetic products, identifying the key allergens involved and examining recent regulatory and diagnostic developments. The review addresses which substances commonly induce allergic contact dermatitis and how current trends and emerging allergens impact clinical practice. RECENT

findingsFragrances remain the most prevalent cosmetic allergens, with numerous compounds capable of triggering sensitization. Recent regulatory improvements in fragrance labeling are helping to reduce exposure to major allergens. Preservatives such as formaldehyde and isothiazolinones have historically caused widespread allergic reactions, but restrictions have lowered their incidence. Hair cosmetic allergens, especially para-phenylenediamine (PPD) and related chemicals, continue to cause significant allergic responses in consumers and professionals. Newly recognized allergens appear in sunscreens, skin lightening agents, and natural ingredients like propolis and carvone. The primary diagnostic methods include patch testing with baseline and specialized cosmetic allergen panels, photopatch testing for photoallergens, and repeated open application tests to support clinical evaluation. Contact allergy due to cosmetics is a growing dermatological issue, primarily driven by fragrances and hair dye allergens, with emerging allergens contributing to the evolving landscape. Continued vigilance in diagnosis, improved regulatory measures, and increased reporting are essential to reduce allergy rates and enhance patient care. This review underlines the need for ongoing research and prevention strategies targeting novel cosmetic allergens.

Indexed as

AllergensCosmeticsDermatitis, Allergic ContactHumansPatch TestsAllergensCosmeticsAllergic contact dermatitisCosmeticsPatch testRepeated open application test

Identifiers

PMID41134517
PMCPMC12552389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.