ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2025
What is New in Contact Allergy To Cosmetics for Physicians, Cosmetologists, and Cosmetic Users?
Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Pantothenic Acid as an Unexpected Cause of Hypersensitivity to Sensitive or Atopic Skin Care Products-A Narrative Review.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- A Parade of Persistent and Emerging Contact Allergens - A Clinical Update.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis paper aims to evaluate the burden of contact allergy caused by cosmetic products, identifying the key allergens involved and examining recent regulatory and diagnostic developments. The review addresses which substances commonly induce allergic contact dermatitis and how current trends and emerging allergens impact clinical practice. RECENT
findingsFragrances remain the most prevalent cosmetic allergens, with numerous compounds capable of triggering sensitization. Recent regulatory improvements in fragrance labeling are helping to reduce exposure to major allergens. Preservatives such as formaldehyde and isothiazolinones have historically caused widespread allergic reactions, but restrictions have lowered their incidence. Hair cosmetic allergens, especially para-phenylenediamine (PPD) and related chemicals, continue to cause significant allergic responses in consumers and professionals. Newly recognized allergens appear in sunscreens, skin lightening agents, and natural ingredients like propolis and carvone. The primary diagnostic methods include patch testing with baseline and specialized cosmetic allergen panels, photopatch testing for photoallergens, and repeated open application tests to support clinical evaluation. Contact allergy due to cosmetics is a growing dermatological issue, primarily driven by fragrances and hair dye allergens, with emerging allergens contributing to the evolving landscape. Continued vigilance in diagnosis, improved regulatory measures, and increased reporting are essential to reduce allergy rates and enhance patient care. This review underlines the need for ongoing research and prevention strategies targeting novel cosmetic allergens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.