Trial reportAdvances in therapy2025
Efficacy and Safety of 48-Week Low-Dose Dienogest Treatment in Patients with Endometriosis-Associated Dysmenorrhea: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Trial.
Trial report in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical and endocrine effects of pharmacological therapy in endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Adolescent dysmenorrhea revealing Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich syndrome with endometriosis: A radiologic case report.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDienogest (DNG) is widely used to manage endometriosis-associated pain; however, long-term data comparing low and standard doses are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 48-week DNG treatment (1 mg/day vs. 2 mg/day) in patients with endometriosis-related dysmenorrhea (composite score).
methodsIn this randomized, open-label, parallel-group, trial, 88 patients with endometriosis were enrolled, all of whom had at least one ovarian endometriotic cyst confirmed by imaging. Other phenotypes of endometriosis, such as deep infiltrating or peritoneal lesions, were not systematically assessed and may have been present. Patients were randomized to receive either 1-mg/day or 2-mg/day DNG. The primary endpoint was the change in menstrual pain measured using a visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary endpoints included changes in the dysmenorrhea score, ovarian endometrioma volume, serum estradiol levels, bone mineral density (BMD), and menopausal symptoms.
resultsBoth groups demonstrated a significant reduction in menstrual pain (VAS). The mean VAS scores decreased by 44.63 and 54.19 mm in the 1-mg and 2-mg groups, respectively. However, the between-group difference (- 9.57 mm; 95% confidence interval: - 22.7 to 3.56) was not above the predefined non-inferiority margin of - 15 mm; thus, non-inferiority of the 1-mg dose could not be confirmed. Improvements in dysmenorrhea scores and endometrioma volume were also observed in both groups, although greater effects were noted in the 2-mg group than in the 1-mg group. Serum estradiol suppression was comparable between the groups, whereas BMD loss was less pronounced in the 1-mg group than in the 2-mg group.
conclusionsThis study did not demonstrate statistical non-inferiority of 1-mg/day DNG treatment over 2-mg/day DNG treatment for pain relief. These results suggest that the 2-mg/day dose may offer more robust analgesic effects, particularly during the early treatment phase. However, 1-mg/day DNG still showed meaningful symptom improvement with fewer adverse events than 2-mg/day DNG, supporting its potential use in selected patients requiring long-term therapy. Trial Registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, trial registration number: jRCTs041210016.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.