Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41134515›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2025

Value Contribution of Palopegteriparatide in Adult Patients with Chronic Hypoparathyroidism using Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA).

Juan José Díez, Xavier Badia, Reyes Abad, Carmen Alerany, Mónica Climente Martí, Josep Maria Guiu, Isabel Martín, María Caballero, Manuel Muñoz Torres

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Juan José DíezDeparment of Endocrinology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Calle Manuel de Falla 1, 28222, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain. juanjose.diez@salud.madrid.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2017-0694
Xavier BadiaOmakase Consulting S.L., Barcelona, Spain.
Reyes AbadHospital Pharmacy Service, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Saragossa, Spain.
Carmen AleranyHospital Pharmacy Service, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Mónica Climente MartíHospital Pharmacy Service, Doctor Peset University Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Josep Maria GuiuConsortium of Health and Social Care of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
Isabel MartínHospital Pharmacy Service, A Coruña University Hospital, A Coruña, Spain.
María CaballeroOmakase Consulting S.L., Barcelona, Spain.
Manuel Muñoz TorresEndocrinology and Nutrition Unit, San Cecilio University Hospital, Granada, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe study objective was to determine the value contribution of palopegteriparatide to the treatment of adults with chronic hypoparathyroidism, a rare endocrine disease, through a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA).

methodsThe Orphar-SEFH group framework for evaluating orphan drugs was used, along with the weighting performed by 98 national and regional evaluators. A multidisciplinary panel of seven experts individually scored the evidence matrix. The scores were collected and analysed using Microsoft Excel software programmed for MCDA study analysis. The results were discussed in a reflective discussion session.

resultsThe expert panel considered chronic hypoparathyroidism to be a moderate-to-severe disease (mean ± SD: 3.3 ± 0.5) due to its multiorgan impact and associated comorbidities, with significant unmet needs (3.6 ± 1.0), particularly related to the lack of the physiological effect due to insufficient levels of parathyroid hormone. The experts found palopegteriparatide as an add-on treatment to conventional therapy (calcium and active vitamin D) to be much more effective than placebo plus conventional therapy, with this criterion receiving the highest score. The safety profile was considered acceptable (1.6 ± 1.1). The participants highlighted the positive impact of palopegteriparatide on patient-reported outcomes (2.9 ± 0.9) compared to placebo because of improvements in quality of life (QoL). Palopegteriparatide was seen as a potentially disease-modifying treatment, which could lead to savings in "other medical costs" (3.1 ± 1.1) and "non-medical/indirect costs" (2.0 ± 0.8), although no evidence was available, especially in the long term. The quality of the evidence was perceived as high (3.6 ± 0.5). The overall value contribution of palopegteriparatide was 0.58 (+ 1 = maximum value) compared to placebo. The study has some limitations, including a relatively small panel size and the exclusion of treatment cost as a criterion due to lack of pricing information at the time of evaluation.

conclusionAccording to MCDA, palopegteriparatide represents a valuable therapeutic option for chronic hypoparathyroidism treatment, particularly due to its demonstrated efficacy, which had an impact on patients' QoL, and the current unmet needs in this therapeutic area.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesHypoparathyroidismPeptidesAdultChronic DiseaseCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleQuality of LifePeptidesChronic hypoparathyroidismDecision-makingHealth technology assessmentMCDAMulti-criteria decision analysisOrphan drugRare disease

Identifiers

PMID41134515
PMCPMC12618378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.