ArticleClinical rheumatology2025
Association of macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1 and its locus with osteoarthritis: Mendelian randomization and colocalization analysis.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Letter to the editor: "The association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and clinical outcomes in Chinese adult inpatients: A retrospective cohort stud".Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- Response by Wang to Letter Regarding Article, "The association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and clinical outcomes in Chinese adult inpatients: a retrospective cohort study".Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWith the rising prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA), this disease places a substantial economic burden on society. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of effective therapeutic agents to completely cure OA. This study thus aims to identify potential genetic targets that might influence the progression of OA.
methodsUsing Mendelian randomization (MR), the correlation between the levels of macrophage colony-stimulating factor (CSF-1) and its associated genetic loci with OA at different anatomical sites was investigated. Data were primarily obtained from the arcOGEN Consortium, the UK Biobank, and other relevant sources. Additionally, Summary Data-based Mendelian Randomization (SMR), Mendelian Randomization, and colocalization analysis were used to examine the relation of 16,989 cis-eQTL genes from the eQTLGen database with OA at various locations, to facilitate the identification of potential genetic loci that might affect the progression of OA.
resultsThrough MR analysis of two databases, we found a direct correlation between CSF-1 levels and knee OA (OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.02-1.15; OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.03-1.35). Further gene screening and colocalization analysis confirmed that FLOT1, IER3, and STRIP1 are positively correlated with knee OA, while TMEM171 is negatively correlated with hand OA.
conclusionThis study employed MR analysis to explore the causal relationship between CSF-1 and osteoarthritis, revealing a potential causal link between high levels of macrophage colony-stimulating factor and increased risk of knee osteoarthritis. Additionally, through various analytical methods, we identified four potential genetic targets: FLOT1, IER3, STRIP1, and TMEM171. These findings offer new insights into the genetic foundation of osteoarthritis and provide potential targets for future treatment strategies. Key Points • We provided genetic evidence supporting the use of MR methods to demonstrate a causal relationship between knee osteoarthritis and CSF-1 and its genetic loci. • Four genetic loci are potentially associated with the progression of osteoarthritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41134489What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.