ReviewJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026
Genomics of pregnancy loss.
Review in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pregnancy loss is the most common obstetric complication occurring in almost 15% of pregnancies. Of the examined products of conception (POC), approximately 60% of pregnancy losses result from chromosomal abnormalities and copy number variations (CNVs) in embryos, but genetic etiologies of euploid pregnancy loss remain largely unexplained. Previous studies suggest that genetic factors make a significant contribution to embryonic mortality. We aimed to review the results of current genomic studies of gene variants associated with miscarriage, including exome sequencing to look for pathogenic variants in the whole exome, as well as high-coverage whole-genome sequencing in families with miscarriages. We compared the lists of genes causative of or predisposing to miscarriage in parents and POCs. Additionally, we summarize novel genetic variants, which may be responsible for embryonic aneuploidy according to WES/WGS studies. Identification of genes that contribute to pregnancy loss is of importance in understanding the biological pathways that can cause pregnancy loss and an informative approach for discovering the key genes for human development. Knowledge of specific genes that contribute to pregnancy loss could also be valued in designing a diagnostic sequencing panel for patients with recurrent pregnancy loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.