Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41134437›Full record

ReviewPlant molecular biology2025

Exploring LOG genes: drivers of prickle evolution in the plant kingdom.

Priya Kumari, Vandana Jaiswal

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Plant molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Priya KumariBiotechnology Division, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur, India.
Vandana JaiswalBiotechnology Division, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Palampur, India. vandana.jaiswal2009@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8620-7595

Funding

Council of Scientific and industrial research, India MLP-201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Convergent evolution, where unrelated species independently evolve similar traits, provides valuable insights into the genetic and developmental adaptation. In plants, physical defenses like spines, thorns, and prickles exemplifies this phenomenon. These structures, collectively termed "spinescence," arise from distinct developmental origins-spines from leaves, thorns from stems or branches, and prickles as epidermal outgrowths-but converge in function to deter herbivory and enhance survival. Among these, prickles are particularly interesting due to their morphological diversity and repeated gain or loss across various plant lineages. The genus Solanum serve as model for studying prickle genetics. In "Spiny Solanums," prickles evolved approximately six million years ago, with prickle loss occurring multiple times as seen in domesticated eggplant (Solanum melongena). Recent studies identify the LONELY GUY (LOG) gene family, crucial for cytokinin biosynthesis, as a key regulator of prickle development. Loss-of-function mutations in LOG homologs associated with prickleless phenotypes in various plants, including roses, chinese dates, and alfalfa, suggesting a conserved role in prickle suppression. This review explores the evolutionary, genetic, and molecular mechanisms underlying prickle development, emphasizing the LOG gene family. It discusses phenotypic convergence and agriculture applications, such as breeding prickle-free crops, offering broader insights into plant adaptation and the evolution of physical defenses.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEvolution, MolecularGenes, PlantPlant ProteinsSolanumGene Expression Regulation, PlantPhenotypePlant ProteinsCytokininEvolutionGenome-editingLOGPlant kingdomPrickle

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.