Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41134427›Full record

ArticleHealth care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy2025

The Function of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) Request Forms in the Australian Context.

Hilary Bowman-Smart, Molly Johnston, Michelle Taylor-Sands, Lisa Hui, Catherine Mills

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hilary Bowman-SmartAustralian Centre for Precision Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2142-9696
Molly JohnstonMonash Bioethics Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3786-0843
Michelle Taylor-SandsMelbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3161-3320
Lisa HuiMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9720-3562
Catherine MillsMonash Bioethics Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. catherine.mills@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1684-418X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is offered on a user-pays basis in Australia, with a range of providers and services available. A key concern raised about NIPT provision is the impact on informed consent of possible routinization of testing. Given these concerns, the documents, forms and informational material used in clinical practice are of critical importance. Test-specific request forms produced by commercial providers are frequently used in Australia, but there is a lack of clarity about the function or role of these forms. Some are labelled as "request forms", while others include references to "informed consent". Our aim in this study was to assess the range of functions that these forms may serve. We performed an online search for forms available from Australian providers in 2024 and applied a modified version of the Evaluative Linguistic Framework to a final list of eight forms. Our findings indicate significant heterogeneity and ambiguity in the function of these forms. We suggest these forms play a role in the performance of informed consent as a clinical ritual. Documents and forms can play a supportive role in counselling related to NIPT, but this supportive role should be recognized and articulated. These findings can inform the way healthcare professionals in Australia and other settings approach NIPT provision.

Indexed as

Document analysisGeneticsInformed consentNon-invasive prenatal testingPrenatal screeningRoutinization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.