ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025
Subbandage pressure assessment in the lower limb during supine positioning of patients in hip arthroplasty when traction is applied: a comparison between single and double layer bandages.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePatient positioning in orthopedic and trauma surgery requires maximum stability while preserving passive mobility of the operated limb. When traction tables or positioning aids are used, the legs are secured in traction boots. This study evaluated sub-bandage pressure in the lower extremity of a supine-positioned specimen during hip arthroplasty, comparing single- and double-layer bandage systems.
methodsA flexible multilayer and a more rigid single-layer bandage system were compared in mechanical traction tests on a cadaveric specimen. Subbandage pressure was recorded through repetitive measurements at various traction forces, ranging from 80 to 200 N.
resultsDue to its rigidity, iFix generated higher pressure near the ankle, providing better stability even at 200 N. In contrast, CO showed higher pressure at the proximal tibia and heel lift at maximum force due to its elasticity. The study found that patient fixation using the tested systems is only justifiable if the tensile force remains below 80 N throughout surgery.
conclusionFixation with the tested systems is only advisable if the tensile force remains below 80 N throughout surgery. Short-term increases (e.g., for hip dislocation) are acceptable but should be brief and followed by adequate relief to allow tissue reperfusion. Additional padding is strongly recommended to distribute subbandage pressure at high traction forces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.