SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025
Efficacy and safety of nicardipine prolonged-release implants in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral vasospasm (CV) is a major complication following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), significantly contributing to morbidity and mortality. Nicardipine Prolonged-Release Implants (NPRI) offer targeted, localized drug delivery to prevent CV. This meta-analysis evaluated NPRI's efficacy and safety in reducing CV, mortality, and adverse events in patients with aSAH undergoing aneurysm repair. A systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane (inception-November 2024). Included RCTs compared NPRI plus standard care vs. standard care alone. Outcomes: CV, mortality, and adverse events. A random-effects model calculated risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed via I². Registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024629347). From 214 identified records, three RCTs comprising 84 patients (NPRI group: 45; control group: 39) met inclusion criteria. NPRI significantly reduced CV incidence (RR, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.09-0.60]; P = .002) with low heterogeneity (I² = 37%). Mortality was also significantly reduced in the NPRI group (RR, 0.18 [95% CI, 0.03-0.95]; P = .044; I² = 0%). Adverse events were less frequent in the NPRI group (RR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.18-0.97]; P = .043; I² = 0%). This meta-analysis provides preliminary evidence supporting NPRI to reduce CV, mortality, and adverse events in aSAH. Despite the small number of included studies, low heterogeneity and significant effect sizes suggest NPRI as a promising intervention. Larger-scale RCTs with extended follow-up are required to validate these findings and define NPRI's role in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41134407What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.