Trial reportNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
The effect of Edaravone on acute ischemic stroke, large vessel occlusion, not treated with intravenous thrombolytic, and endovascular thrombectomy: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
Trial report in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral stroke is a significant cause of death and disability. Ischemic stroke, comprising 85% of cases, can be treated with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV-rTPA) within 4.5 h or endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) within 24 h in appropriately selected patients. IV-rTPA is often ineffective for large vessel occlusions, and EVT is not universally available, leading to conservative treatment. This study aimed to investigate the effects of Edaravone on the clinical and radiological recovery of patients with ischemic stroke, large vessel occlusion, who did not receive IV-rTPA and EVT. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to be conducted in this patient population and is a prelude to further studies. A double-blinded clinical trial enrolled 60 ischemic stroke patients (NIHSS > 16) within 24 h of onset who were ineligible for IV-rTPA or EVT. Patients were randomized to Edaravone group (n = 30) and non-Edaravone group (n = 30). Clinical evaluation used NIHSS score, and radiological assessment used ASPECT score. Demographic data showed no significant differences between groups in age (p = 0.744), gender (p = 0.782), or BMI (p = 0.658). Hospitalization duration was also similar (p = 0.508). Comorbidities were common (90%) with no significant intergroup differences (p ≥ 0.05). The Edaravone group showed significant improvement in ASPECT score post-intervention (p = 0.012). NIHSS scores did not differ significantly (p = 0.312). Edaravone improved radiological outcomes but not clinical outcomes in ischemic stroke patients with NIHSS scores > 16 who did not receive IV-rTPA and EVT. Further investigation into Edaravone's effectiveness is warranted, particularly in patients with lower NIHSS scores, as well as longer follow-up periods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41134351What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.