Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41134277›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025

Optimizing Predictive Models for Distance and Near Vision Outcomes in Presbyopic Surgery Using Machine Learning.

Soodabeh Darzi, Pierre Baudu, Franck Penin, Samuel Arba Mosquera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Soodabeh DarziSCHWIND eye-tech-solutions, Kleinostheim, Germany.
Pierre BauduClinique Avicenne, Le Port, Ile de la Réunion, France.
Franck PeninSCHWIND France eye-tech-solutions, Habsheim, France.
Samuel Arba MosqueraSCHWIND eye-tech-solutions, Kleinostheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop predictive models for postoperative visual acuity-both near and distance, monocular and binocular-and a composite outcome metric, distance-corrected visual gain (DCVG), in patients undergoing presbyopic corneal refractive surgery. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 914 eyes from 457 patients treated with PresbyMAX who completed 6 months of follow-up. Machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest regression and classification models, were applied to predict corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), both measured using the same distance correction. Feature importance was evaluated using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) and partial dependence plots (PDPs). Results: Binocular models outperformed monocular in predictive accuracy, and CDVA was more predictable than DCNVA. A clinical trade-off was observed whereby improvements of up to three lines in DCNVA could be achieved without significant CDVA loss. The optimal planned addition ranged between +1.50 D and +2.25 D, balancing near and distance vision outcomes. Patients 45 to 56 years of age showed greater potential for near vision gain without compromising distance vision. The DCVG metric effectively quantified overall visual benefits, with only a minority of cases showing a net loss. Conclusions: Predictive modeling combined with the DCVG metric enables personalized surgical planning by identifying key factors influencing outcomes. This approach supports better management of the visual trade-offs inherent in presbyopic refractive surgery. Translational Relevance: Machine learning-based prediction models and the DCVG metric facilitate individualized clinical decision-making, improving patient counseling and optimizing the balance between near and distance vision in presbyopic treatment.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPresbyopiaRefractive Surgical ProceduresVisual AcuityAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesVision, Binocular

Identifiers

PMID41134277
PMCPMC12574737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.