ArticleJournal of vision2025
Facial feature representations in visual working memory: A reverse correlation study.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For humans, storing facial identities in visual working memory (VWM) is crucial. Despite vast research on VWM, it is not well known how face identity and physical features (e.g., eyes) are encoded in VWM representations. Moreover, while it is widely assumed that VWM face representations encode efficiently the subtle individual differences in facial features, this assumption has been difficult to investigate directly. Finally, it is not known how facial representations are forgotten. Some facial features could be more susceptible to forgetting than others, or conversely, all features could decay randomly. Here, we use a novel application of psychophysical reverse correlation, enabling us to estimate how various facial features are weighted in VWM representations, how statistically efficient these representations are, and how representations decay with time. We employed the same-different task with two retention times (1 s and 4 s) with morphed face stimuli, enabling us to control the appearance of each facial feature independently. We found that only a few features, most prominently the eyes, had high weighting, suggesting face VWM representations are based on storing a few key features. A classifier using stimulus information near-optimally showed markedly similar weightings to human participants-albeit weighing eyes less and other features more-suggesting that human VWM face representations are surprisingly close to statistically optimal encoding. There was no difference in weightings between retention times; instead, internal noise increased, suggesting that forgetting in face VWM works as a random process rather than as a change in remembered facial features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.